Inspector of Police, Sivagangai Town Crime P.S vs Thangaraj — 66/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,506(ii),IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNSV020053392024

Filing Number

5192/2021

Filing Date

06-Sep-2021

Registration No

66/2021

Registration Date

06-Sep-2021

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,506(ii),IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Sivagangai Town Crime P.S

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangaraj

  2. 2.Lakshmanan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted both accused Thangaraj and Setchunan of charges under IPC Sections 397 (robbery), 392 (dacoity), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence, finding the prosecution witnesses unreliable and their testimonies contradictory. The court ruled that the state failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, despite circumstantial evidence and police investigation records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 13-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 15-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 02-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 13-Nov-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 06-Oct-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 22-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 22-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 11-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 28-Aug-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 24-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 10-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 11-Jun-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 26-May-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 05-May-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 23-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 24-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 24-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 31-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 09-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 12-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 07-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 13-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 19-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 21-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 04-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 08-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 15-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 06-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted both accused Thangaraj and Setchunan of charges under IPC Sections 397 (robbery), 392 (dacoity), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence, finding the prosecution witnesses unreliable and their testimonies contradictory. The court ruled that the state failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, despite circumstantial evidence and police investigation records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case