SIVAGANGAI TOWN PS 325/24 vs SOMURAJA — 539/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV020026442025

Evidence

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2025

Filing Number

2623/2025

Filing Date

02-07-2025

Registration No

539/2025

Registration Date

26-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai

Judge

5-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.I

FIR Details

FIR Number

325

Police Station

Sivagangai Town Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

SIVAGANGAI TOWN PS (Police Station) 325/24

Adv. Inspector of police Sivagangai town ps

Respondent(s)

SOMURAJA

PRIYADHARSHINI

SULOKSHANA

KAVITHA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.I

27-05-2026

Evidence

06-05-2026

Evidence

30-04-2026

Evidence

28-04-2026

Evidence

27-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

28-04-2026
Copy of deposition

Case CC. 539/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Sivagangai recorded the deposition of PW 3 (witness) on 28th April 2026. The witness testified that she had no knowledge of the case details, denied that documents and sketches presented were prepared in her presence, and stated police did not investigate her regarding the matter. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution and cross-examined. The defense did not cross-examine. The court allowed the hostile designation and examination to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case CC. 539/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Sivagangai recorded the deposition of PW 3 (witness) on 28th April 2026. The witness testified that she had no knowledge of the case details, denied that documents and sketches presented were prepared in her presence, and stated police did not investigate her regarding the matter. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution and cross-examined. The defense did not cross-examine. The court allowed the hostile designation and examination to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case