Pushpalatha vs Selvi — 157/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 r/w 142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV020010432025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-03-2025
Filing Number
1035/2025
Filing Date
21-03-2025
Registration No
157/2025
Registration Date
21-03-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai
Judge
5-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpalatha
Adv. Ramprabahar RMK
Respondent(s)
Selvi
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.I
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 157/2025 (Pushpalatha v. Selvi) This is a civil case involving disputed loans and financial transactions. Pushpalatha (petitioner/PW1) testified during cross-examination regarding allegations that respondent Selvi demanded repayment of ₹3,60,000, claiming loans were advanced. Pushpalatha denied receiving the alleged loans (₹50,000 in November 2023 and ₹2.50 lakhs in June 2023) and disputed claims about mortgaged property and documents. The witness testimony covered conflicting accounts of money transactions, document authenticity, and police complaints filed by the respondent. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statements and admissions during proceedings before the Sub-Judge at Chengalpattu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 157/2025 (Pushpalatha v. Selvi) This is a civil case involving disputed loans and financial transactions. Pushpalatha (petitioner/PW1) testified during cross-examination regarding allegations that respondent Selvi demanded repayment of ₹3,60,000, claiming loans were advanced. Pushpalatha denied receiving the alleged loans (₹50,000 in November 2023 and ₹2.50 lakhs in June 2023) and disputed claims about mortgaged property and documents. The witness testimony covered conflicting accounts of money transactions, document authenticity, and police complaints filed by the respondent. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statements and admissions during proceedings before the Sub-Judge at Chengalpattu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts