Saranraj vs Inspector of Police Kalaiyarkovil P.S. — 383/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV020007832026

Filing Number

779/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

383/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

561

Police Station

Kalayarkovil Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saranraj

    Adv. VALMEEGANATHAN.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Kalaiyarkovil P.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai granted bail to Saranraj, who was accused under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) BNS. The court found that investigation was complete, further custody was unnecessary, and the prosecution failed to justify extended incarceration despite the accused being in jail for 86 days since December 16, 2025. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and daily police reporting for 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 383/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai granted bail to Saranraj, who was accused under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) BNS. The court found that investigation was complete, further custody was unnecessary, and the prosecution failed to justify extended incarceration despite the accused being in jail for 86 days since December 16, 2025. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and daily police reporting for 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case