Ragu vs Forest Range Sivagangai — 363/2026

The Judicial Magistrate court allowed Ragu's petition and granted him interim custody of a Vivo V2204 mobile phone seized during a Wildlife Protection Act investigation, after verifying his ownership through Aadhar identity and tax invoice documents. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with surety, provide photographs and CD of the property, execute a panchanama before the Head Clerk, and not transfer or alter the property while producing it as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.