Inspector of police, Palayanoor P.S vs Muruganatham and Others — 200065/2016
Case under Criminal Law Amendment Act 1908 Section 147,148,294(b)323,336,324,307IPc3ofPPDLAct. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV020002402016
Filing Number
200065/2016
Filing Date
02-Apr-2016
Registration No
200065/2016
Registration Date
02-Apr-2016
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of police, Palayanoor P.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muruganatham and Others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: S.C. No. 65/2016 Court Decision: All 12 accused persons were acquitted of all charges. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies and gaps in witness testimony. Key Findings: While injuries were medically documented, the prosecution could not establish which specific accused committed which acts. Critical witnesses gave conflicting accounts, hostile witnesses undermined the investigation narrative, and no individual overt acts were attributed to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Questioning
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Questioning
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Framing of Charges
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jun-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jun-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2024
Issue of Service
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2024
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2017
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2017
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2017
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2017
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2017
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Oct-2016
Framing of Charges
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2016
Service Pending
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2016
Service Pending
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Sep-2016
Service Pending
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2016
Framing of Charges
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Aug-2016
Framing of Charges
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Aug-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jul-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jul-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jun-2016
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2016
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-May-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 200065/2016
-
24-Jan-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
Case Summary: S.C. No. 65/2016 Court Decision: All 12 accused persons were acquitted of all charges. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies and gaps in witness testimony. Key Findings: While injuries were medically documented, the prosecution could not establish which specific accused committed which acts. Critical witnesses gave conflicting accounts, hostile witnesses undermined the investigation narrative, and no individual overt acts were attributed to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts