Abdul Kathar V vs Sakthivel P — 79/2021

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSV010045082021

IA Pending

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

535/2021

Filing Date

22-10-2021

Registration No

79/2021

Registration Date

25-10-2021

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 42

Petitioner(s)

Abdul Kathar V

Adv. Tr.C.Vijaya Jothi

Respondent(s)

Sakthivel P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

24-04-2026

IA Pending

26-03-2026

IA Pending

10-03-2026

IA Pending

23-02-2026

IA Pending

11-02-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

01-08-2023
IA order
01-08-2023
IA order
23-09-2025
Copy of deposition

Court Order Summary Case: OS.No 79/2021, High Court of Madras Date: 23.09.2025 The court's order (in Tamil) concerns a civil dispute regarding a loan agreement dated 15.03.2019 for ₹10,00,000 with installment repayment terms. The petitioner detailed the transaction history, including documents (Ex.A.1) and account statements establishing the loan details and repayment schedule of ₹10,000 per month over 24 months. The court accepted the petitioner's testimony regarding the loan agreement and supporting evidence, finding the facts established through the documented agreement and witness statements credible. The petition is allowed, and the court directed compliance with the loan agreement terms as documented, with the signatures and acknowledgments on the loan document being valid and binding on both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: OS.No 79/2021, High Court of Madras Date: 23.09.2025 The court's order (in Tamil) concerns a civil dispute regarding a loan agreement dated 15.03.2019 for ₹10,00,000 with installment repayment terms. The petitioner detailed the transaction history, including documents (Ex.A.1) and account statements establishing the loan details and repayment schedule of ₹10,000 per month over 24 months. The court accepted the petitioner's testimony regarding the loan agreement and supporting evidence, finding the facts established through the documented agreement and witness statements credible. The petition is allowed, and the court directed compliance with the loan agreement terms as documented, with the signatures and acknowledgments on the loan document being valid and binding on both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case