Inspector of Police, Sipcot P.S vs Prabakaran Advocate - Loganathan A — 57/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV010035402024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2960/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
57/2024
Registration Date
30-09-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
216
Police Station
SIPCOT Police Station, Manamadurai.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Sipcot P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Prabakaran Advocate - Loganathan A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Court acquitted the accused in both cases (Spl.S.C. Nos. 56/2024 and 57/2024) on charges under IPC Section 379 and Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, respectively. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of unauthorized mining and transport of minerals without government permission, as the government witnesses' testimonies contained significant gaps, inconsistencies, and lack of proper documentation regarding the seized vehicles and mined minerals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Special Court acquitted the accused in both cases (Spl.S.C. Nos. 56/2024 and 57/2024) on charges under IPC Section 379 and Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, respectively. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of unauthorized mining and transport of minerals without government permission, as the government witnesses' testimonies contained significant gaps, inconsistencies, and lack of proper documentation regarding the seized vehicles and mined minerals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts