Inspector of Polcie, SIPCOT P.S, Manamadurai vs Prabhakaran Advocate - Loganathan A — 56/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV010035392024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2959/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
30-09-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
216
Police Station
SIPCOT Police Station, Manamadurai.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Polcie, SIPCOT P.S, Manamadurai
Adv. Addl Public Procetutor
Respondent(s)
Prabhakaran Advocate - Loganathan A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 07-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District Court of Chennai acquitted the accused in both cases (Special Criminal Cases 56/2024 and 57/2024) and discharged him under IPC Section 235(1). The court found that while the accused was charged with violating Section 379 IPC (theft) and Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 for allegedly transporting sand without government permission, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of criminality due to procedural lapses, inconsistencies in witness statements, and lack of proper documentation regarding the seized vehicles and materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal District Court of Chennai acquitted the accused in both cases (Special Criminal Cases 56/2024 and 57/2024) and discharged him under IPC Section 235(1). The court found that while the accused was charged with violating Section 379 IPC (theft) and Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 for allegedly transporting sand without government permission, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of criminality due to procedural lapses, inconsistencies in witness statements, and lack of proper documentation regarding the seized vehicles and materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts