Sathiskumar vs Umamageshwari Advocate - MOHANASUNDRAM.M — 71/2024

Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section 7,10,25. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSV010033172024

e-Filing Number

06-09-2024

Filing Number

570/2024

Filing Date

12-Sep-2024

Registration No

71/2024

Registration Date

19-Sep-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section 7,10,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sathiskumar

    Adv. AMALAVIJI R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Umamageshwari Advocate - MOHANASUNDRAM.M

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    IA orderView PDF

    Case Summary: I.A.No.1/2025 in G.W.O.P.No.71/2024 Outcome: The court granted the petitioner (father/Sathiskumar) visitation rights with his 10-year-old daughter. The father is permitted to visit the child twice monthly on the second and fourth Sundays between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., with prior notice to the respondent mother, at a neutral public location. Key Facts: Following marital breakdown and competing custody cases (O.S.No.11/2023 and D.V.C.No.2/2024), the mother denied the father contact with their daughter born in March 2018. The court held that despite parental disputes, the child cannot be deprived of paternal love, and visitation serves the minor's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  16. 20-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  18. 26-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  19. 14-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  20. 03-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  21. 21-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  22. 16-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  23. 05-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  24. 12-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  25. 20-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  26. 17-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  27. 18-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  28. 03-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  29. 16-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  30. 05-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  31. 23-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  32. 19-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 12-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: I.A.No.1/2025 in G.W.O.P.No.71/2024 Outcome: The court granted the petitioner (father/Sathiskumar) visitation rights with his 10-year-old daughter. The father is permitted to visit the child twice monthly on the second and fourth Sundays between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., with prior notice to the respondent mother, at a neutral public location. Key Facts: Following marital breakdown and competing custody cases (O.S.No.11/2023 and D.V.C.No.2/2024), the mother denied the father contact with their daughter born in March 2018. The court held that despite parental disputes, the child cannot be deprived of paternal love, and visitation serves the minor's welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case