Muruganantham P vs Nagarajan K — 96/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d),25(d),30,44,27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV010031632022
Filing Number
372/2022
Filing Date
04-Jul-2022
Registration No
96/2022
Registration Date
28-Jul-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muruganantham P
Adv. Bharath C.D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nagarajan K
-
2.Ananthi N
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
23-Apr-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
26-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
10-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
02-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
03-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
07-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
11-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
20-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
25-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
26-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
29-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
30-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
29-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
19-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
18-Feb-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
07-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
28-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
24-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
26-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
18-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
23-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
13-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
25-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
04-Jul-2024
IA orderView PDF
The petition filed by P. Muruganantham under Order 39 Rule 1, 2 and Section 151 of CPC seeking temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from encumbering or alienating the suit property has been closed. The order provides a detailed schedule of the property in dispute but does not explicitly state whether the injunction was granted or denied in the final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
24-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
06-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
29-Jan-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
07-Dec-2023
Issues
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
24-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
29-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
02-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
25-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
22-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
12-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
02-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
27-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
06-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
09-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
30-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
04-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
24-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
14-Oct-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
29-Aug-2022
Batta
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
28-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2022
The petition filed by P. Muruganantham under Order 39 Rule 1, 2 and Section 151 of CPC seeking temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from encumbering or alienating the suit property has been closed. The order provides a detailed schedule of the property in dispute but does not explicitly state whether the injunction was granted or denied in the final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts