The Inspector of Police DCB P.S, Sivagangai vs Kaleeswaran(a — 103/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,477(A),420. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNSV010027122024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-07-2024

Filing Number

2294/2024

Filing Date

29-07-2024

Registration No

103/2024

Registration Date

27-08-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

D.C.B. Police Station, Sivagangai

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 409,408,477(A),420
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police DCB P.S, Sivagangai

Adv. manivannan k

Respondent(s)

Kaleeswaran(a

Suresh(a

Vasudevan

Murugan(a

Selvam

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

21-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Judgement

12-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

19-01-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case C.A.103/2024 The Sivagangai High Court quashed criminal charges against five accused (Kaleeswaran, Suresh, Vasudevan, Murugan, and Nallai) who allegedly misappropriated ₹55,49,920 from government storage during a 2013 procurement operation. Finding insufficient evidence of individual criminal culpability and procedural lapses in the investigation—including missing documents, unverified witnesses, and lack of proper authorization proof for the accused's government roles—the court invalidated the prosecution case under IPC sections 120(b), 408-409, 420, and 477(A) on April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case C.A.103/2024 The Sivagangai High Court quashed criminal charges against five accused (Kaleeswaran, Suresh, Vasudevan, Murugan, and Nallai) who allegedly misappropriated ₹55,49,920 from government storage during a 2013 procurement operation. Finding insufficient evidence of individual criminal culpability and procedural lapses in the investigation—including missing documents, unverified witnesses, and lack of proper authorization proof for the accused's government roles—the court invalidated the prosecution case under IPC sections 120(b), 408-409, 420, and 477(A) on April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case