Inspector of Police D.C.B P.S Sivagangai vs Manikandan — 97/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNSV010026702024
e-Filing Number
22-07-2024
Filing Number
2262/2024
Filing Date
24-Jul-2024
Registration No
97/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
D.C.B. Police Station, Sivagangai
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police D.C.B P.S Sivagangai
Adv. manivannan k
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manikandan
-
2.Ramaraja
-
3.Brinthavan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 97/2025 Court Decision: The High Court quashed the criminal case against three respondents (Manikandan, Ramaraja, and Brinthavan) charged under IPC Sections 408 and 409, finding insufficient evidence to prove criminal breach of trust and criminal dishonesty. The court set aside a prior judgment from July 2023 that had convicted them based on an alleged misappropriation of ₹7,54,890 in a police custody case from May 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
27-Feb-2026
Await Records
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
27-Jan-2026
Await Records
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 97/2025
Case Summary: 97/2025 Court Decision: The High Court quashed the criminal case against three respondents (Manikandan, Ramaraja, and Brinthavan) charged under IPC Sections 408 and 409, finding insufficient evidence to prove criminal breach of trust and criminal dishonesty. The court set aside a prior judgment from July 2023 that had convicted them based on an alleged misappropriation of ₹7,54,890 in a police custody case from May 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts