Inspector Of Police Dcb Police Station, Sivagangai vs Anbalagan — 115/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNSV010026672024
e-Filing Number
22-07-2024
Filing Number
2259/2024
Filing Date
24-07-2024
Registration No
115/2024
Registration Date
11-09-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
D.C.B. Police Station, Sivagangai
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police Dcb Police Station, Sivagangai
Adv. manivannan k
Respondent(s)
Anbalagan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 19-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 115/2024 Summary The High Court quashed the conviction of respondent Anbalagan under IPC Section 409 (criminal breach of trust), finding that the investigation was incomplete and evidence insufficient to establish criminal culpability. The court determined that since the respondent was not designated as the "public servant" custodian of the property in question (a warehouse inventory involving ₹4,22,740), Section 409 could not apply, and therefore directed his acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 115/2024 Summary The High Court quashed the conviction of respondent Anbalagan under IPC Section 409 (criminal breach of trust), finding that the investigation was incomplete and evidence insufficient to establish criminal culpability. The court determined that since the respondent was not designated as the "public servant" custodian of the property in question (a warehouse inventory involving ₹4,22,740), Section 409 could not apply, and therefore directed his acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts