Sarkkarai Mohammed S vs Hidayathulla S — 41/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b),25(d),25(d),25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSV010014632022

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

170/2022

Filing Date

29-03-2022

Registration No

41/2022

Registration Date

29-03-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25(b),25(d),25(d),25(d)

Petitioner(s)

Sarkkarai Mohammed S

Adv. Gurukrishna Govindarajan

Chellakkannu S(Died)

Respondent(s)

Hidayathulla S

Abdul Karim S

Arasakumar V

Alagumeenal A

Syed ali fathima

Mohammed Abdul Nasar

Mohammed Abdullah

Mohideen Abdul Kader

Rabiyadh Basuriya

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

21-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

29-01-2026
Copy of deposition

The court order in Original Suit No. 41/2022 (Madurai District Court) dated 29.01.2026 addresses a property dispute involving Hiba (gift) deeds. The court found that the Hiba documents were not properly registered and that the plaintiff failed to establish ownership or possession of the disputed properties. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, ruling that the defendants had no obligation to transfer the properties and the plaintiff has no rights over them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order in Original Suit No. 41/2022 (Madurai District Court) dated 29.01.2026 addresses a property dispute involving Hiba (gift) deeds. The court found that the Hiba documents were not properly registered and that the plaintiff failed to establish ownership or possession of the disputed properties. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, ruling that the defendants had no obligation to transfer the properties and the plaintiff has no rights over them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case