Muniyasamy vs Irudhayaraj Advocate - VALMEKANATHAN.S — 28/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV010012452024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
146/2024
Filing Date
18-03-2024
Registration No
28/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muniyasamy
Adv. CHITTHIRAICHAMY.K
Respondent(s)
Irudhayaraj Advocate - VALMEKANATHAN.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS.NO.28/2024 (DW1) This is a civil case involving defendant Irudhayaraj (Advocate Valmekanathan S) presenting his defense testimony. The defendant claims that in June 2010, the plaintiff transferred Rs. 10,00,000 via check to his ICICI bank account; that properties in Sivagangai district valued at Rs. 20 lakhs were mortgaged to him as security; and that properties jointly purchased by the plaintiff, defendant, and plaintiff's brother-in-law were registered in their respective names on 02.01.2013 and 06.06.2013. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination as per the advocate's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS.NO.28/2024 (DW1) This is a civil case involving defendant Irudhayaraj (Advocate Valmekanathan S) presenting his defense testimony. The defendant claims that in June 2010, the plaintiff transferred Rs. 10,00,000 via check to his ICICI bank account; that properties in Sivagangai district valued at Rs. 20 lakhs were mortgaged to him as security; and that properties jointly purchased by the plaintiff, defendant, and plaintiff's brother-in-law were registered in their respective names on 02.01.2013 and 06.06.2013. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination as per the advocate's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts