Gurusamy K vs Lakshmi Advocate - Muruganantham B.A — 33/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSV010010952024

Filing Number

124/2024

Filing Date

08-Mar-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

25-Mar-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gurusamy K

    Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmi Advocate - Muruganantham B.A

  2. 2.Thamaraikannan Minor

    Adv. Muruganantham B.A

  3. 3.Thamarai Minor

    Adv. Muruganantham B.A

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 33/2024 Court: Primary District Court, Sivagangai Date: 02.04.2026 Outcome: Case DISMISSED. The court found the petitioner's (Gurusamy K) testimony unreliable and concluded he fabricated the loan claim against respondent Saravan. The petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of the alleged debt, and material discrepancies in his statements (regarding loan dates, witnesses, and subsequent recovery attempts) undermined his case. The petition was dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  10. 13-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  16. 08-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  17. 19-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  18. 03-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  19. 27-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  20. 21-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  21. 30-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  22. 20-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  23. 22-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  24. 03-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  25. 23-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  26. 15-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  27. 05-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  28. 25-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  29. 25-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 08-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 33/2024 Court: Primary District Court, Sivagangai Date: 02.04.2026 Outcome: Case DISMISSED. The court found the petitioner's (Gurusamy K) testimony unreliable and concluded he fabricated the loan claim against respondent Saravan. The petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of the alleged debt, and material discrepancies in his statements (regarding loan dates, witnesses, and subsequent recovery attempts) undermined his case. The petition was dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case