Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch P.S, Sivagangai vs Anbu Ramu Raja — 8/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section Section 378. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNSV010009472024

e-Filing Number

20-02-2024

Filing Number

861/2024

Filing Date

29-Feb-2024

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

05-Feb-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

D.C.B. Police Station, Sivagangai

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section Section 378

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch P.S, Sivagangai

    Adv. alagarsamy

  2. 2.Inspector Of Police

    Adv. alagarsamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anbu Ramu Raja

  2. 2.Raveendhiran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 8/2025 The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against respondents Anbu Ramu Raja and Raveendhiran, finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. The court determined that charges under IPC sections 409, 420, and 120(b) against the first respondent and sections 408, 420, and 120(b) against the second respondent could not be sustained, citing procedural irregularities and lack of proper investigation documentation presented by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  11. 01-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  14. 15-Apr-2025

    Await Records

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  15. 05-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  16. 05-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 29-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 8/2025 The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against respondents Anbu Ramu Raja and Raveendhiran, finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. The court determined that charges under IPC sections 409, 420, and 120(b) against the first respondent and sections 408, 420, and 120(b) against the second respondent could not be sustained, citing procedural irregularities and lack of proper investigation documentation presented by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case