Thennarasu vs Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S — 538/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010009042026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
720/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
538/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
Devakottai Taluk Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thennarasu
Adv. manivannan k
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 538/2026 (Thennarasu v. Inspector of Police, Devakottai) The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Thennarasu, accused of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation with weapons, and abduction arising from a money dispute. The court found that no injury occurred, the petitioner had no criminal history, and the underlying dispute was financial in nature. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily police station reporting for 30 days, no state travel without permission, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
13-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 538/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 538/2026 (Thennarasu v. Inspector of Police, Devakottai) The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Thennarasu, accused of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation with weapons, and abduction arising from a money dispute. The court found that no injury occurred, the petitioner had no criminal history, and the underlying dispute was financial in nature. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily police station reporting for 30 days, no state travel without permission, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts