Thennarasu vs Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S — 538/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010009042026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

720/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

538/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

Devakottai Taluk Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Thennarasu

Adv. manivannan k

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Bail Bond/Personal Bond

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 538/2026 (Thennarasu v. Inspector of Police, Devakottai) The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Thennarasu, accused of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation with weapons, and abduction arising from a money dispute. The court found that no injury occurred, the petitioner had no criminal history, and the underlying dispute was financial in nature. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily police station reporting for 30 days, no state travel without permission, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 538/2026 (Thennarasu v. Inspector of Police, Devakottai) The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Thennarasu, accused of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation with weapons, and abduction arising from a money dispute. The court found that no injury occurred, the petitioner had no criminal history, and the underlying dispute was financial in nature. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily police station reporting for 30 days, no state travel without permission, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case