Palaniappan vs Inspector of Police Karaikudi south P.S — 536/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010009032026
Filing Number
719/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
536/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
220
Police Station
Karaikudi South Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Palaniappan
Adv. KARUPPASAMY K
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police Karaikudi south P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.536/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge allowed Palaniappan's petition to modify bail conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court modified the requirement that the accused report daily at Virudhunagar Town Police Station to instead report at Virudhunagar West Police Station at 10:30 a.m., with all other bail conditions remaining unchanged. Key Reasoning: The petitioner sought modification because he was already appearing before Virudhunagar West Police Station in another criminal matter as directed by the High Court. The respondent (State) raised no objection to the modification, and the court found the petitioner's reason for seeking the change sufficient to warrant approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.536/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge allowed Palaniappan's petition to modify bail conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court modified the requirement that the accused report daily at Virudhunagar Town Police Station to instead report at Virudhunagar West Police Station at 10:30 a.m., with all other bail conditions remaining unchanged. Key Reasoning: The petitioner sought modification because he was already appearing before Virudhunagar West Police Station in another criminal matter as directed by the High Court. The respondent (State) raised no objection to the modification, and the court found the petitioner's reason for seeking the change sufficient to warrant approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts