Gurunathan vs Lingaperumal alias Lingam — 533/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 338(2),Intervene,Petition. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010008942026
Filing Number
714/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
533/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Karaikudi North Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gurunathan
Adv. Babu Prasadh SS
Respondent(s)
Lingaperumal alias Lingam
Prabhu
Adv. selvakumar P
Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 533/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Gurunathan's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. The petitioners Lingaperumal and Prabhu sought bail against charges of assault with an iron rod causing grievous head injury, abusive language, and threats under BNS Sections 296(b), 109, and 351(3). The court rejected the application as this was the second anticipatory bail request, the injured was still undergoing private hospital treatment, investigation remained in early stages, and the accused had absconded since February 26, 2026, presenting flight risk concerns. The intervening petition was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 533/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Gurunathan's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. The petitioners Lingaperumal and Prabhu sought bail against charges of assault with an iron rod causing grievous head injury, abusive language, and threats under BNS Sections 296(b), 109, and 351(3). The court rejected the application as this was the second anticipatory bail request, the injured was still undergoing private hospital treatment, investigation remained in early stages, and the accused had absconded since February 26, 2026, presenting flight risk concerns. The intervening petition was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts