Muthuramalingam vs Inspector of Police Sivagangai taluk P.S — 524/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008892026

Filing Number

710/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

524/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Sivagangai Taluk Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

1.Muthuramalingam

Adv. RAMPRABAHAR.R.M.K
2.Rameshwari
3.Koorilakshmi

Respondent(s)

1.Inspector of Police Sivagangai taluk P.S

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.524/2026 The court dismissed the petitioners' request to modify bail conditions. The three accused (ages 63-70) sought to relax a requirement to report twice weekly to the police station, citing their senior citizen status. The Principal Sessions Judge rejected the petition, finding no satisfactory reasons for modification and noting the Public Prosecutor's concern that relaxing conditions could enable future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 524/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.524/2026 The court dismissed the petitioners' request to modify bail conditions. The three accused (ages 63-70) sought to relax a requirement to report twice weekly to the police station, citing their senior citizen status. The Principal Sessions Judge rejected the petition, finding no satisfactory reasons for modification and noting the Public Prosecutor's concern that relaxing conditions could enable future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.