Saranraj vs Inspector of Police Kalaiyarkovil P.S — 515/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008722026

Filing Number

697/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

515/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

571

Police Station

Kalayarkovil Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saranraj

    Adv. VALMEKANATHAN.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Kalaiyarkovil P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai allowed the bail petition of Saranraj (21), the second accused in a robbery case involving charges under BNS sections 331(4) and 305(a). The court granted bail considering that the stolen property had been recovered, investigation was nearly complete, the co-accused had already been released on bail, and the petitioner had suffered prolonged incarceration. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days, residence in Virudhunagar District, no witness tampering, and cooperation in case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 515/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai allowed the bail petition of Saranraj (21), the second accused in a robbery case involving charges under BNS sections 331(4) and 305(a). The court granted bail considering that the stolen property had been recovered, investigation was nearly complete, the co-accused had already been released on bail, and the petitioner had suffered prolonged incarceration. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days, residence in Virudhunagar District, no witness tampering, and cooperation in case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case