Dharmaraja vs Inspector of Police Sivagangai town P.S — 507/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008642026

Filing Number

689/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

507/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

135

Police Station

Sivagangai Town Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmaraja

    Adv. BALACHANDRAN.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Sivagangai town P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the bail petition of Dharmaraja, who was arrested for threatening the public with a sword, obstructing police duty, and illegal weapon possession under sections 132, 351(3) of BNS Act and 25(1A) Arms Act. The court rejected bail based on the petitioner's criminal antecedents including a previous murder case, the investigation being in premature stage, and the risk of absconding or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 507/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the bail petition of Dharmaraja, who was arrested for threatening the public with a sword, obstructing police duty, and illegal weapon possession under sections 132, 351(3) of BNS Act and 25(1A) Arms Act. The court rejected bail based on the petitioner's criminal antecedents including a previous murder case, the investigation being in premature stage, and the risk of absconding or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case