Bharathiraja vs Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S — 505/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010008622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
687/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
505/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
Devakottai Taluk Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharathiraja
Adv. Bharathi Kannan KR
Govindarajan
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 11-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to two accused (Bharathiraja and Govindarajan) charged with criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and damage to property under BNS sections 126(2), 324(2), 140(3), and 351(3). The court found that the dispute arose from a money disagreement, no one sustained injuries, the accused had no prior criminal records, and they had been in custody since March 8, 2026. The court imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 30 days, restrictions on leaving Tamil Nadu, and prohibitions on witness intimidation. The intervening petition opposing the bail was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to two accused (Bharathiraja and Govindarajan) charged with criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and damage to property under BNS sections 126(2), 324(2), 140(3), and 351(3). The court found that the dispute arose from a money disagreement, no one sustained injuries, the accused had no prior criminal records, and they had been in custody since March 8, 2026. The court imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 30 days, restrictions on leaving Tamil Nadu, and prohibitions on witness intimidation. The intervening petition opposing the bail was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts