Lingaperumal alias Lingam vs Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S — 519/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010008602026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
685/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
519/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Karaikudi North Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lingaperumal alias Lingam
Adv. selvakumar P
-
2.Prabhu
Adv. selvakumar P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions filed by Lingaperumal and Prabhu, who faced charges under BNS sections 296(b), 109, and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting a person with an iron rod causing head injury. The court found that the investigation remained in a premature stage with the accused absconding since February 26, 2026, the injured person still undergoing private hospital treatment, and no changed circumstances warranting bail reconsideration, particularly since this was their second bail application. The intervening petition by the de facto complainant was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
11-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge, Sivagangai
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 519/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions filed by Lingaperumal and Prabhu, who faced charges under BNS sections 296(b), 109, and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting a person with an iron rod causing head injury. The court found that the investigation remained in a premature stage with the accused absconding since February 26, 2026, the injured person still undergoing private hospital treatment, and no changed circumstances warranting bail reconsideration, particularly since this was their second bail application. The intervening petition by the de facto complainant was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts