Lingaperumal alias Lingam vs Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S — 519/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008602026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

685/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

519/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Karaikudi North Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Lingaperumal alias Lingam

Adv. selvakumar P

Prabhu

Adv. selvakumar P

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Enquiry

10-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Bail Bond/Personal Bond

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions filed by Lingaperumal and Prabhu, who faced charges under BNS sections 296(b), 109, and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting a person with an iron rod causing head injury. The court found that the investigation remained in a premature stage with the accused absconding since February 26, 2026, the injured person still undergoing private hospital treatment, and no changed circumstances warranting bail reconsideration, particularly since this was their second bail application. The intervening petition by the de facto complainant was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the anticipatory bail petitions filed by Lingaperumal and Prabhu, who faced charges under BNS sections 296(b), 109, and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting a person with an iron rod causing head injury. The court found that the investigation remained in a premature stage with the accused absconding since February 26, 2026, the injured person still undergoing private hospital treatment, and no changed circumstances warranting bail reconsideration, particularly since this was their second bail application. The intervening petition by the de facto complainant was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case