Naina Mohamad Sallarai vs Inspector of police Thiruppachethy PS — 489/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008392026

Filing Number

670/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

489/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

ThiruppaChetti Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naina Mohamad Sallarai

    Adv. Adhisivam S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police Thiruppachethy PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Court Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai granted bail to Naina Mohamed Sallarai, accused of possessing tobacco products for illegal sale under sections 275 and 123 of BNS and section 24(1) of COTP Act. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody since March 4, 2026, had no prior criminal record, no one was injured, and the alleged products were recovered, warranting bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police station appearances for 15 days, and restrictions on leaving Tamil Nadu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 489/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai granted bail to Naina Mohamed Sallarai, accused of possessing tobacco products for illegal sale under sections 275 and 123 of BNS and section 24(1) of COTP Act. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody since March 4, 2026, had no prior criminal record, no one was injured, and the alleged products were recovered, warranting bail with conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, daily police station appearances for 15 days, and restrictions on leaving Tamil Nadu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case