Gowri vs Inspector of Police Poovanthi P.S — 455/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010007782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

619/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

455/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

Poovanthi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Gowri

Adv. selvakumar P

Murugan

Adv. selvakumar P

Pandeeswari

Adv. selvakumar P

Vishnu

Adv. selvakumar P

Pushpavalli

Adv. selvakumar P

Muthupandi

Adv. selvakumar P

Annalakshmi

Adv. selvakumar P

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police Poovanthi P.S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Enquiry

06-03-2026

Enquiry

05-03-2026

Enquiry

04-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Bail Bond/Personal Bond

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons charged with unlawful assembly, rioting, and assault under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPWH Act section 4. The court considered that the injured had recovered and the accused had no prior criminal history, imposing conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 15 days, availability for interrogation, and prohibition from leaving Tamil Nadu without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons charged with unlawful assembly, rioting, and assault under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPWH Act section 4. The court considered that the injured had recovered and the accused had no prior criminal history, imposing conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police station reporting for 15 days, availability for interrogation, and prohibition from leaving Tamil Nadu without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case