Parameswari M vs The Manager, Sivagangai Samasthanam Devasathanam, Advocate - GOPAL.M — 9/2024

Case under National Highways Act Section 3G,3H(4). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSV010005102024

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

51/2024

Filing Date

31-01-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

31-01-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

Acts & Sections

National Highways Act Section 3G,3H(4)
Ia/2/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section Parameswari M

Petitioner(s)

Parameswari M

Adv. SENGOLE.J

Respondent(s)

The Manager, Sivagangai Samasthanam Devasathanam, Advocate - GOPAL.M

Ganapathy E

Adv. Sudharsan Prabhu

Malaichamy A

Adv. Sudharshan Prabhu K.R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI

09-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of deposition

Case Summary: NHOP.No.9/2024 Date: 12.03.2026 Outcome: Cross-examination of Witness 1 (Ilango) by respondents' counsel adjourned. The witness testified regarding his 20-year tenure as Manager of Sivagangai Samasthanam Devasathanam and property matters related to Sri Subramaniaswami Temple. Key disputed issues included land donation documents, trustee designations, and the Samasthanam's approximately 100 years of property management. The cross-examination was deferred to allow further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NHOP.No.9/2024 Date: 12.03.2026 Outcome: Cross-examination of Witness 1 (Ilango) by respondents' counsel adjourned. The witness testified regarding his 20-year tenure as Manager of Sivagangai Samasthanam Devasathanam and property matters related to Sri Subramaniaswami Temple. Key disputed issues included land donation documents, trustee designations, and the Samasthanam's approximately 100 years of property management. The cross-examination was deferred to allow further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case