Sevugamoorthy vs Inspector of Police Kallal P.S — 9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440,438. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNSV010004632026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

375/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

236

Police Station

Kallal Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440,438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sevugamoorthy

    Adv. VALMEKA NATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Kallal P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Sevugamoorthy v. Inspector of Police Kallal P.S (Crl.R.P.No.9/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai allowed Sevugamoorthy's revision petition and ordered return of a seized TATA HITACHI earthmoving vehicle to him for interim custody. The court found that the lower court's dismissal based on pending legal heirship disputes was invalid, reasoning that keeping the vehicle idle would cause deterioration and financial loss to the owner. The order grants interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 2 lakh bond and prohibition on alienation, while clarifying the order does not determine final ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sevugamoorthy v. Inspector of Police Kallal P.S (Crl.R.P.No.9/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai allowed Sevugamoorthy's revision petition and ordered return of a seized TATA HITACHI earthmoving vehicle to him for interim custody. The court found that the lower court's dismissal based on pending legal heirship disputes was invalid, reasoning that keeping the vehicle idle would cause deterioration and financial loss to the owner. The order grants interim custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 2 lakh bond and prohibition on alienation, while clarifying the order does not determine final ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case