Suryaprakash D vs Inspector of Police Alagappapuram P.S — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNSV010003322026
e-Filing Number
23-01-2026
Filing Number
269/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
ALAGAPPAPURAM P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suryaprakash D
Adv. SS Babu prasadh
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police Alagappapuram P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Orders
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders |
| 07-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Suryaprakash D v. Inspector of Police Alagappapuram P.S (Crl.R.P.No.8/2026) The Principal Sessions Court allowed Suryaprakash's revision petition and ordered return of his seized Bajaj Super 150 motorcycle for interim custody, overturning the lower court's dismissal. The court found the Judicial Magistrate's reasons (seriousness of offences and vehicle's role in crime) insufficient, holding that the vehicle owner would suffer irreparable loss from prolonged non-use and depreciation. The motorcycle was released subject to conditions including Rs.25,000 personal bond, vehicle photography, production on demand, and prohibition on alterations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Suryaprakash D v. Inspector of Police Alagappapuram P.S (Crl.R.P.No.8/2026) The Principal Sessions Court allowed Suryaprakash's revision petition and ordered return of his seized Bajaj Super 150 motorcycle for interim custody, overturning the lower court's dismissal. The court found the Judicial Magistrate's reasons (seriousness of offences and vehicle's role in crime) insufficient, holding that the vehicle owner would suffer irreparable loss from prolonged non-use and depreciation. The motorcycle was released subject to conditions including Rs.25,000 personal bond, vehicle photography, production on demand, and prohibition on alterations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts