The Station Officer vs JAYABALAN Advocate - RAMESH. B. S. — 64/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b)131. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA210000962025
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2025
Filing Number
87/2025
Filing Date
30-05-2025
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
30-05-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Yercaud
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Yercaud
FIR Details
FIR Number
238
Police Station
Yercaud
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Station Officer
Adv. Yercaud Police Station
Respondent(s)
JAYABALAN Advocate - RAMESH. B. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Yercaud
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a cross-examination transcript of witness PW-5 (Chandran) in Case No. STC. No.64/2025 dated 25.03.2026 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Yercaud. The cross-examination, conducted in Tamil, records the witness's testimony regarding relationships with accused persons A.Sa.1 and A.Sa.3, police interrogation procedures, and the signing of statements. The transcript was read over to and admitted as correct by the witness, with no substantive order on bail, petition, or case adjournment documented in this portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a cross-examination transcript of witness PW-5 (Chandran) in Case No. STC. No.64/2025 dated 25.03.2026 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Yercaud. The cross-examination, conducted in Tamil, records the witness's testimony regarding relationships with accused persons A.Sa.1 and A.Sa.3, police interrogation procedures, and the signing of statements. The transcript was read over to and admitted as correct by the witness, with no substantive order on bail, petition, or case adjournment documented in this portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts