YAMINI vs MOHANRAJ — 167/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(i-a). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA190007672025
e-Filing Number
25-08-2025
Filing Number
864/2025
Filing Date
25-08-2025
Registration No
167/2025
Registration Date
12-09-2025
Court
SubCourt, Omalur
Judge
4-Sub Judge, Omalur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YAMINI
Adv. Subashchandiraboss
Respondent(s)
MOHANRAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Sub Judge, Omalur
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 03-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Family Court at Omalur granted a divorce petition filed by Yamini against Mohanraj under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, annulling their love marriage solemnized on June 13, 2008. The court found that the respondent abandoned the petitioner and their 14-year-old son, subsequently contracting a second marriage with another woman, establishing irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. The petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence (birth certificate, Aadhaar cards, FIR, and photographs) remained uncontested as the respondent failed to appear before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Family Court at Omalur granted a divorce petition filed by Yamini against Mohanraj under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, annulling their love marriage solemnized on June 13, 2008. The court found that the respondent abandoned the petitioner and their 14-year-old son, subsequently contracting a second marriage with another woman, establishing irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. The petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence (birth certificate, Aadhaar cards, FIR, and photographs) remained uncontested as the respondent failed to appear before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts