KARTHIK vs MEENA — 124/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(i-a). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA190005872025
e-Filing Number
23-07-2025
Filing Number
644/2025
Filing Date
25-Jul-2025
Registration No
124/2025
Registration Date
25-Jul-2025
Court
SubCourt, Omalur
Judge
4-Sub Judge, Omalur
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARTHIK
Adv. SABARINATHAN J
Respondent(s)
-
1.MEENA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Subordinate Court in Omalur, Tamil Nadu granted a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, annulling the marriage solemnized on February 14, 2022, between the petitioner (R. Karthik) and respondent (R. Meena). The court found that the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty through continuous harassment, humiliation, false accusations, denial of household amenities, refusal to cohabit, threats regarding their child, and attempted conversion to Christianity, making continued cohabitation impossible. The respondent's failure to appear before the court resulted in an ex-parte decree being issued in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
10-Mar-2026
Orders
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
26-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
04-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
16-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Notice
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
29-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Notice
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
25-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 124/2025
Summary The Subordinate Court in Omalur, Tamil Nadu granted a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, annulling the marriage solemnized on February 14, 2022, between the petitioner (R. Karthik) and respondent (R. Meena). The court found that the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty through continuous harassment, humiliation, false accusations, denial of household amenities, refusal to cohabit, threats regarding their child, and attempted conversion to Christianity, making continued cohabitation impossible. The respondent's failure to appear before the court resulted in an ex-parte decree being issued in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts