M/s Shriram Finance Ltd Rep By Its Authorised Representative P Jayakumar, Theevattipatty Branch vs Saraswathi — 36/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21Rule11(2). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNSA190002142024
e-Filing Number
21-03-2024
Filing Number
247/2024
Filing Date
22-Mar-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
02-Apr-2024
Court
SubCourt, Omalur
Judge
4-Sub Judge, Omalur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Shriram Finance Ltd Rep By Its Authorised Representative P Jayakumar, Theevattipatty Branch
Adv. Thangabalu P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Saraswathi
-
2.Manikumar
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case: EP. 36/2024, Subordinate Court, Omalur, dated 07.04.2026 Outcome: A witness (M.Sa.1) testified and affirmed their examination-in-chief statement regarding Sri Ram Transport Finance Company Limited. The court admitted the earlier statement dated 22.10.2012 (Ar.O.P.199/2012) as evidence. No cross-examination was conducted, and the proceedings were concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Orders
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
11-Nov-2025
Counter
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
09-Sep-2025
Counter
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
02-Aug-2025
Batta
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
05-Apr-2025
Batta
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
28-Feb-2025
Batta
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
07-Dec-2024
Batta
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
10-Aug-2024
Service Pending
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
03-Aug-2024
Service Pending
Sub Judge, Omalur
-
02-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2024
Case Summary Case: EP. 36/2024, Subordinate Court, Omalur, dated 07.04.2026 Outcome: A witness (M.Sa.1) testified and affirmed their examination-in-chief statement regarding Sri Ram Transport Finance Company Limited. The court admitted the earlier statement dated 22.10.2012 (Ar.O.P.199/2012) as evidence. No cross-examination was conducted, and the proceedings were concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts