Neshmitha Textils, vs Aara Textiles — 712/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 138and141. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 10th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180046842024
e-Filing Number
03-12-2024
Filing Number
4679/2024
Filing Date
06-12-2024
Registration No
712/2024
Registration Date
06-12-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Neshmitha Textils,
Adv. Senthil Kumar
Respondent(s)
Aara Textiles
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur convicted Mohanraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonoured twice due to insufficient funds. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for a legitimate business transaction (purchase of textiles worth Rs. 31,82,550), rejecting his defence that the cheque was given without his knowledge by his brother. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation, with an additional two months imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur convicted Mohanraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonoured twice due to insufficient funds. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for a legitimate business transaction (purchase of textiles worth Rs. 31,82,550), rejecting his defence that the cheque was given without his knowledge by his brother. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation, with an additional two months imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts