Neshmitha Textils, vs Aara Textiles — 712/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 138and141. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 10th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180046842024
e-Filing Number
03-12-2024
Filing Number
4679/2024
Filing Date
06-Dec-2024
Registration No
712/2024
Registration Date
06-Dec-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Neshmitha Textils,
Adv. Senthil Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aara Textiles
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur convicted Mohanraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonoured twice due to insufficient funds. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for a legitimate business transaction (purchase of textiles worth Rs. 31,82,550), rejecting his defence that the cheque was given without his knowledge by his brother. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation, with an additional two months imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
04-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
26-Feb-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
17-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
10-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
25-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
23-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
09-Sep-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
03-Sep-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
12-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
18-Jun-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
14-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
29-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
08-Apr-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
24-Feb-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
10-Jan-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
-
06-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 712/2024
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur convicted Mohanraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque worth Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonoured twice due to insufficient funds. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for a legitimate business transaction (purchase of textiles worth Rs. 31,82,550), rejecting his defence that the cheque was given without his knowledge by his brother. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation, with an additional two months imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts