SI OF POLICE JALAKANDAPURAM PS vs CHANDRA Advocate - PERIYASAMY.M — 799/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),296(b),324(2),351(3),131. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180042242025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
4214/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
799/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE JALAKANDAPURAM PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHANDRA Advocate - PERIYASAMY.M
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (Mani) in Criminal Case No. 799/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur, dated 22.01.2026. The witness testified about an incident where the accused allegedly destroyed a compound wall in front of his house, abused him, and physically assaulted him along with accomplices (Chandra, Nataraja, and Rajukanthi) approximately 8 months prior. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged pre-existing disputes with the accused, admitted the accused used a pathway in front of his house, and confirmed he sustained only minor injuries rather than bleeding wounds. The court recorded the witness deposition and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (Mani) in Criminal Case No. 799/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur, dated 22.01.2026. The witness testified about an incident where the accused allegedly destroyed a compound wall in front of his house, abused him, and physically assaulted him along with accomplices (Chandra, Nataraja, and Rajukanthi) approximately 8 months prior. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged pre-existing disputes with the accused, admitted the accused used a pathway in front of his house, and confirmed he sustained only minor injuries rather than bleeding wounds. The court recorded the witness deposition and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts