SI OF POLICE JALAKANDAPURAM PS vs CHANDRA Advocate - PERIYASAMY.M — 799/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),296(b),324(2),351(3),131. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA180042242025

Evidence

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

e-Filing Number

08-10-2025

Filing Number

4214/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

799/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),296(b),324(2),351(3),131

Petitioner(s)

SI OF POLICE JALAKANDAPURAM PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

CHANDRA Advocate - PERIYASAMY.M

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

05-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

17-02-2026

Evidence

11-02-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (Mani) in Criminal Case No. 799/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur, dated 22.01.2026. The witness testified about an incident where the accused allegedly destroyed a compound wall in front of his house, abused him, and physically assaulted him along with accomplices (Chandra, Nataraja, and Rajukanthi) approximately 8 months prior. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged pre-existing disputes with the accused, admitted the accused used a pathway in front of his house, and confirmed he sustained only minor injuries rather than bleeding wounds. The court recorded the witness deposition and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (Mani) in Criminal Case No. 799/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur, dated 22.01.2026. The witness testified about an incident where the accused allegedly destroyed a compound wall in front of his house, abused him, and physically assaulted him along with accomplices (Chandra, Nataraja, and Rajukanthi) approximately 8 months prior. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged pre-existing disputes with the accused, admitted the accused used a pathway in front of his house, and confirmed he sustained only minor injuries rather than bleeding wounds. The court recorded the witness deposition and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case