Rani vs Arun — 1761/2025
Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA180030262025
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
e-Filing Number
29-07-2025
Filing Number
3018/2025
Filing Date
02-08-2025
Registration No
1761/2025
Registration Date
02-08-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Petitioner(s)
Rani
Adv. KAMARAJ S
Respondent(s)
Arun
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness statement (PW1 testimony) recorded in a criminal case (STC No. 1761/2025) before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur on March 6, 2026. The witness, Rani (age 54), testifies regarding a monetary dispute where she allegedly lent ₹5,00,000 to the defendant through a promissory note, claiming the defendant's mother borrowed the funds and that the defendant later failed to repay. The witness denies filing a formal complaint and states she gave the money based on trust without witnesses or documentation. The examination was completed at 12:50 PM; no cross-examination was conducted, and the witness affirmed her testimony before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness statement (PW1 testimony) recorded in a criminal case (STC No. 1761/2025) before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur on March 6, 2026. The witness, Rani (age 54), testifies regarding a monetary dispute where she allegedly lent ₹5,00,000 to the defendant through a promissory note, claiming the defendant's mother borrowed the funds and that the defendant later failed to repay. The witness denies filing a formal complaint and states she gave the money based on trust without witnesses or documentation. The examination was completed at 12:50 PM; no cross-examination was conducted, and the witness affirmed her testimony before the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts