Inspector Of Police Mecheri Police Station vs Nithishwaran Advocate - SIVARAMAN R — 366/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 05th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180029312025
e-Filing Number
19-07-2025
Filing Number
2924/2025
Filing Date
21-07-2025
Registration No
366/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police Mecheri Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nithishwaran Advocate - SIVARAMAN R
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Mettur acquitted the accused Nithishwaran of charges under Section 281 and 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that while the victim died from head injuries sustained in the collision, the prosecution failed to prove rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt, primarily due to credibility issues with the two main eyewitnesses (who were relatives of the deceased) and missing corroborating evidence from a third witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Mettur acquitted the accused Nithishwaran of charges under Section 281 and 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that while the victim died from head injuries sustained in the collision, the prosecution failed to prove rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt, primarily due to credibility issues with the two main eyewitnesses (who were relatives of the deceased) and missing corroborating evidence from a third witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts