The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram vs VASANTHI — 288/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180022612025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2025
Filing Number
2254/2025
Filing Date
30-05-2025
Registration No
288/2025
Registration Date
21-06-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VASANTHI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Mettur Case No: C.C. 288/2025 Date: 16.03.2026 This is a witness deposition document in a theft/burglary case (FIR No. 67/2025 u/s 306 BNS). The prosecution witness, a former police officer, testified about the investigation into stolen jewelry from a residence. The witness detailed the FIR registration, site inspection, witness interviews, suspect's confessional statement, recovery of ornaments, and seizure procedures. During cross-examination, defense challenged the investigation's credibility, questioning procedural irregularities and lack of documentary evidence linking the accused to the stolen items. No court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is purely a record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Mettur Case No: C.C. 288/2025 Date: 16.03.2026 This is a witness deposition document in a theft/burglary case (FIR No. 67/2025 u/s 306 BNS). The prosecution witness, a former police officer, testified about the investigation into stolen jewelry from a residence. The witness detailed the FIR registration, site inspection, witness interviews, suspect's confessional statement, recovery of ornaments, and seizure procedures. During cross-examination, defense challenged the investigation's credibility, questioning procedural irregularities and lack of documentary evidence linking the accused to the stolen items. No court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is purely a record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts