The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram vs VASANTHI — 288/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA180022612025

e-Filing Number

22-05-2025

Filing Number

2254/2025

Filing Date

30-May-2025

Registration No

288/2025

Registration Date

21-Jun-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VASANTHI

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Mettur Case No: C.C. 288/2025 Date: 16.03.2026 This is a witness deposition document in a theft/burglary case (FIR No. 67/2025 u/s 306 BNS). The prosecution witness, a former police officer, testified about the investigation into stolen jewelry from a residence. The witness detailed the FIR registration, site inspection, witness interviews, suspect's confessional statement, recovery of ornaments, and seizure procedures. During cross-examination, defense challenged the investigation's credibility, questioning procedural irregularities and lack of documentary evidence linking the accused to the stolen items. No court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is purely a record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  13. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  14. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  15. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  16. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  18. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  21. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  23. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  24. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  25. 17-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  27. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  28. 29-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  29. 02-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  31. 11-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  32. 21-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 30-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Mettur Case No: C.C. 288/2025 Date: 16.03.2026 This is a witness deposition document in a theft/burglary case (FIR No. 67/2025 u/s 306 BNS). The prosecution witness, a former police officer, testified about the investigation into stolen jewelry from a residence. The witness detailed the FIR registration, site inspection, witness interviews, suspect's confessional statement, recovery of ornaments, and seizure procedures. During cross-examination, defense challenged the investigation's credibility, questioning procedural irregularities and lack of documentary evidence linking the accused to the stolen items. No court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is purely a record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case