The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram vs VASANTHI — 288/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA180022612025

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2025

Filing Number

2254/2025

Filing Date

30-05-2025

Registration No

288/2025

Registration Date

21-06-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306

Petitioner(s)

The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VASANTHI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

16-04-2026

Evidence

15-04-2026

Evidence

07-04-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Mettur Case No: C.C. 288/2025 Date: 16.03.2026 This is a witness deposition document in a theft/burglary case (FIR No. 67/2025 u/s 306 BNS). The prosecution witness, a former police officer, testified about the investigation into stolen jewelry from a residence. The witness detailed the FIR registration, site inspection, witness interviews, suspect's confessional statement, recovery of ornaments, and seizure procedures. During cross-examination, defense challenged the investigation's credibility, questioning procedural irregularities and lack of documentary evidence linking the accused to the stolen items. No court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is purely a record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Mettur Case No: C.C. 288/2025 Date: 16.03.2026 This is a witness deposition document in a theft/burglary case (FIR No. 67/2025 u/s 306 BNS). The prosecution witness, a former police officer, testified about the investigation into stolen jewelry from a residence. The witness detailed the FIR registration, site inspection, witness interviews, suspect's confessional statement, recovery of ornaments, and seizure procedures. During cross-examination, defense challenged the investigation's credibility, questioning procedural irregularities and lack of documentary evidence linking the accused to the stolen items. No court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is purely a record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case