UDAYAKUMAR SI vs SRIDHAR — 430/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,352,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180017132025
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
e-Filing Number
11-04-2025
Filing Number
1710/2025
Filing Date
12-04-2025
Registration No
430/2025
Registration Date
14-08-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UDAYAKUMAR SI
Respondent(s)
SRIDHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Trial |
| 27-11-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Criminal Case No. 430/2025 in the Mettur Magistrate Court. The examination of two prosecution witnesses (PW1 - Prakash, age 27, and PW2 - Venkatajalaam, age 48) was recorded on March 3, 2026. Both witnesses testified regarding an alleged assault incident from November 10, 2021, involving the accused and the complainant; however, during cross-examination by the prosecution's own counsel, both witnesses largely retracted or contradicted their earlier statements, ultimately admitting they could not substantiate key allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Criminal Case No. 430/2025 in the Mettur Magistrate Court. The examination of two prosecution witnesses (PW1 - Prakash, age 27, and PW2 - Venkatajalaam, age 48) was recorded on March 3, 2026. Both witnesses testified regarding an alleged assault incident from November 10, 2021, involving the accused and the complainant; however, during cross-examination by the prosecution's own counsel, both witnesses largely retracted or contradicted their earlier statements, ultimately admitting they could not substantiate key allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts