UDAYAKUMAR SI vs SRIDHAR — 430/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,352,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA180017132025

Evidence

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

e-Filing Number

11-04-2025

Filing Number

1710/2025

Filing Date

12-04-2025

Registration No

430/2025

Registration Date

14-08-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,352,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

UDAYAKUMAR SI

Respondent(s)

SRIDHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

10-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

03-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Trial

27-11-2025

Trial

Interim Orders

03-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

This document is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Criminal Case No. 430/2025 in the Mettur Magistrate Court. The examination of two prosecution witnesses (PW1 - Prakash, age 27, and PW2 - Venkatajalaam, age 48) was recorded on March 3, 2026. Both witnesses testified regarding an alleged assault incident from November 10, 2021, involving the accused and the complainant; however, during cross-examination by the prosecution's own counsel, both witnesses largely retracted or contradicted their earlier statements, ultimately admitting they could not substantiate key allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Criminal Case No. 430/2025 in the Mettur Magistrate Court. The examination of two prosecution witnesses (PW1 - Prakash, age 27, and PW2 - Venkatajalaam, age 48) was recorded on March 3, 2026. Both witnesses testified regarding an alleged assault incident from November 10, 2021, involving the accused and the complainant; however, during cross-examination by the prosecution's own counsel, both witnesses largely retracted or contradicted their earlier statements, ultimately admitting they could not substantiate key allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case