L SELVANADHAN vs P DHARSHIKAN — 163/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180016662025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
e-Filing Number
05-04-2025
Filing Number
1663/2025
Filing Date
09-04-2025
Registration No
163/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
L SELVANADHAN
Adv. SIVARAMAN R
Respondent(s)
P DHARSHIKAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 17-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness examination record (P.W. 1 testimony) from Criminal Case No. 163/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur, dated July 11, 2025. The complainant (Selvnathan, age 60) testified under oath regarding a cheque (No. 000139 dated 14.02.2025) issued by the accused that was dishonored due to insufficient funds on 18.02.2025, and submitted supporting documents including the original cheque, bank notice, legal notice dated 04.03.2025, and postal acknowledgment. The examination was concluded at 1:45 PM and the case has been adjourned for cross-examination by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness examination record (P.W. 1 testimony) from Criminal Case No. 163/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur, dated July 11, 2025. The complainant (Selvnathan, age 60) testified under oath regarding a cheque (No. 000139 dated 14.02.2025) issued by the accused that was dishonored due to insufficient funds on 18.02.2025, and submitted supporting documents including the original cheque, bank notice, legal notice dated 04.03.2025, and postal acknowledgment. The examination was concluded at 1:45 PM and the case has been adjourned for cross-examination by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts