Inspector of police vs Gurumoorthy and others — 212/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA180006572026

Filing Number

654/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gurumoorthy and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur allowed the police petition to draw representative samples and destroy seized banned tobacco products (5,500 bundles total) following High Court directives on proper disposal procedures. The court imposed strict conditions including sampling with independent witnesses, detailed photographic and videographic documentation, panchanama preparation, and submission of a destruction memo within 15 days, while dispensing with notice to the accused due to the perishable and banned nature of the products. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Mettur allowed the police petition to draw representative samples and destroy seized banned tobacco products (5,500 bundles total) following High Court directives on proper disposal procedures. The court imposed strict conditions including sampling with independent witnesses, detailed photographic and videographic documentation, panchanama preparation, and submission of a destruction memo within 15 days, while dispensing with notice to the accused due to the perishable and banned nature of the products. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case