Inspector of police, Mettur vs Rajesh — 201/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA180006262026

Filing Number

623/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

201/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Mettur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    The Mettur Judicial Magistrate dismissed Rajesh's bail petition under Section 305(b) BNS, citing his status as a habitual offender involved in 21 similar cases across multiple districts, risk of witness tampering, and potential absconding. The court found that releasing him would hinder the trial process and embolden further offences, despite investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 201/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Mettur Judicial Magistrate dismissed Rajesh's bail petition under Section 305(b) BNS, citing his status as a habitual offender involved in 21 similar cases across multiple districts, risk of witness tampering, and potential absconding. The court found that releasing him would hinder the trial process and embolden further offences, despite investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case