R SIVAKUMAR vs V AYYANDURAI — 90/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA180005732025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2025
Filing Number
570/2025
Filing Date
27-02-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
11-03-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R SIVAKUMAR
Adv. Manikanda Jayakumar N
Respondent(s)
V AYYANDURAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 02-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: C.C. No. 90/2025 | Court: Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Mettur | Date: December 1, 2025 Outcome: Examination-in-chief of PW 1 (Sivakumar) completed and testimony recorded. The witness testified regarding disputed monetary transactions totaling ₹9,50,000, claiming he provided funds as a loan without interest, contradicting the defendant's version. The witness denied receiving promissory notes, lottery tickets, or documents as collateral and refuted allegations of financial involvement with a finance company. Cross-examination was waived; the witness acknowledged the recorded statement and signed before the court. The case proceedings are ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: C.C. No. 90/2025 | Court: Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Mettur | Date: December 1, 2025 Outcome: Examination-in-chief of PW 1 (Sivakumar) completed and testimony recorded. The witness testified regarding disputed monetary transactions totaling ₹9,50,000, claiming he provided funds as a loan without interest, contradicting the defendant's version. The witness denied receiving promissory notes, lottery tickets, or documents as collateral and refuted allegations of financial involvement with a finance company. Cross-examination was waived; the witness acknowledged the recorded statement and signed before the court. The case proceedings are ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts