Arun S vs Sub inspector of police — 117/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497 and 503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA180003752026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

375/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497 and 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arun S

    Adv. RAMACHANDRAN G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    The court allowed the petitioner's petition to release a seized Tractor 355 Compresser on interim custody, citing the Supreme Court principle that no purpose is served by retaining seized vehicles at police stations for extended periods. The release was granted subject to execution of a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, comprehensive photographs, panchnama preparation, and strict conditions including completing RTO mutation within 30 days and not using the vehicle for unlawful purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Await Notice

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Await Notice

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Await Notice

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Await Notice

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Await Notice

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner's petition to release a seized Tractor 355 Compresser on interim custody, citing the Supreme Court principle that no purpose is served by retaining seized vehicles at police stations for extended periods. The release was granted subject to execution of a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, comprehensive photographs, panchnama preparation, and strict conditions including completing RTO mutation within 30 days and not using the vehicle for unlawful purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case