The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram Police Station vs RATHINAM — 68/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281, 106(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Mar-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA180003612025

e-Filing Number

13-01-2025

Filing Number

359/2025

Filing Date

06-Feb-2025

Registration No

68/2025

Registration Date

25-Feb-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281, 106(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Jalakandapuram Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATHINAM

Case History

  1. 30-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Mettur (Case No. C.C. 68/2025), the deposition of prosecution witness Mariyappan was recorded on 27.02.2026. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution after providing testimony that did not support their case, and subsequently underwent cross-examination by the prosecution. The defense declined to cross-examine the witness. The witness testified that he had limited knowledge of the incident and did not know whose negligence caused the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  17. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  18. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  19. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  20. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  21. 12-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  23. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  24. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  25. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  26. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  27. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  28. 18-Jul-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  29. 27-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  30. 22-May-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  31. 09-Apr-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Mettur

  32. 25-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 06-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Mettur (Case No. C.C. 68/2025), the deposition of prosecution witness Mariyappan was recorded on 27.02.2026. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution after providing testimony that did not support their case, and subsequently underwent cross-examination by the prosecution. The defense declined to cross-examine the witness. The witness testified that he had limited knowledge of the incident and did not know whose negligence caused the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case