Saravanan P vs Sub inspector of police — 109/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section BNSS 503 AND 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA180003562026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section BNSS 503 AND 497

Petitioner(s)

Saravanan P

Adv. RAMACHANDRAN G

Respondent(s)

Sub inspector of police

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

06-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Enquiry

01-04-2026

Enquiry

30-03-2026

Enquiry

26-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.

Summary: The Mettur Judicial Magistrate granted interim custody of a Ford 3610 Tractor (Reg. No. TN.34.B.5807) to the owner, Saravanan, despite police opposition in a Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act case. The court reasoned that no valid complaint had been filed by authorized officers, making confiscation proceedings impossible, and that prolonged detention would cause deterioration and hardship to the owner. Custody was granted subject to a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, photographic documentation, panchanama, surrender of registration certificate, and conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or unlawful use of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Mettur Judicial Magistrate granted interim custody of a Ford 3610 Tractor (Reg. No. TN.34.B.5807) to the owner, Saravanan, despite police opposition in a Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act case. The court reasoned that no valid complaint had been filed by authorized officers, making confiscation proceedings impossible, and that prolonged detention would cause deterioration and hardship to the owner. Custody was granted subject to a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, photographic documentation, panchanama, surrender of registration certificate, and conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or unlawful use of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case