Saravanan P vs Sub inspector of police — 109/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section BNSS 503 AND 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSA180003562026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
356/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saravanan P
Adv. RAMACHANDRAN G
Respondent(s)
Sub inspector of police
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 01-04-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 30-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 26-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Mettur Judicial Magistrate granted interim custody of a Ford 3610 Tractor (Reg. No. TN.34.B.5807) to the owner, Saravanan, despite police opposition in a Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act case. The court reasoned that no valid complaint had been filed by authorized officers, making confiscation proceedings impossible, and that prolonged detention would cause deterioration and hardship to the owner. Custody was granted subject to a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, photographic documentation, panchanama, surrender of registration certificate, and conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or unlawful use of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Mettur Judicial Magistrate granted interim custody of a Ford 3610 Tractor (Reg. No. TN.34.B.5807) to the owner, Saravanan, despite police opposition in a Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act case. The court reasoned that no valid complaint had been filed by authorized officers, making confiscation proceedings impossible, and that prolonged detention would cause deterioration and hardship to the owner. Custody was granted subject to a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, photographic documentation, panchanama, surrender of registration certificate, and conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or unlawful use of the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts