Madhavan vs The Inspector of Police — 102/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA180003332026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

333/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Madhavan

    Adv. Senthil Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    The court allowed the vehicle owner's petition for interim custody but imposed a condition: the petitioner must deposit ₹65,000 (the vehicle's market value) as security with the court within three months, to be held in a fixed deposit until the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards compensation to victims of the fatal accident. If the security is not deposited within three months, the vehicle will be sold at public auction with proceeds deposited with the tribunal, as mandated by Tamil Nadu Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the vehicle owner's petition for interim custody but imposed a condition: the petitioner must deposit ₹65,000 (the vehicle's market value) as security with the court within three months, to be held in a fixed deposit until the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards compensation to victims of the fatal accident. If the security is not deposited within three months, the vehicle will be sold at public auction with proceeds deposited with the tribunal, as mandated by Tamil Nadu Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case