Sub Inspector of Police, Mettur P.S. vs karthikeyan — 24/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(2). Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA180001012025

e-Filing Number

02-12-2024

Filing Number

100/2025

Filing Date

22-Jan-2025

Registration No

24/2025

Registration Date

22-Jan-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Conviction

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(2)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police, Mettur P.S.

    Adv. Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.karthikeyan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court convicted Karthikeyan for assaulting his mother-in-law on July 13, 2024, acquitting him of obscene language charges but finding him guilty under Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. He was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment with concurrent sentences and fines totaling Rs. 11,500, with detention already undergone being credited toward the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Cmp Pending

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  11. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  15. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  16. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  17. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  18. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  19. 28-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 28-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  21. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  23. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  24. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  25. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  26. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  27. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  28. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  29. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  30. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  31. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  32. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  33. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  34. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  35. 29-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  36. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  37. 22-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  38. 09-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  39. 07-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  40. 07-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  41. 30-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  42. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  43. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  44. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  45. 26-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  46. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  47. 12-Aug-2025

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  48. 31-Jul-2025

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  49. 25-Jul-2025

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  50. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  51. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  52. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  53. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  54. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  55. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  56. 12-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  57. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  58. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  59. 13-Mar-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  60. 27-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

  61. 22-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 22-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 24/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted Karthikeyan for assaulting his mother-in-law on July 13, 2024, acquitting him of obscene language charges but finding him guilty under Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. He was sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment with concurrent sentences and fines totaling Rs. 11,500, with detention already undergone being credited toward the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case